PENGARUH UMPAN BALIK, KOORDINASI TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN OBJEK KONTROL SISWA PAUD
Abstract
The problem in this study is the low ability of the object of control of kindergarten students in Padang Panjang City of Trustees. The ability of the control object is influenced by many factors, including the learning strategy used on the ability of object control students in TK Padang Panjang. This research uses quasy experiment design. The population in this study were all kindergarten students in Padang Panjang, amounting to 80 people. The sampling technique is done by total sampling. Control object capability data is obtained by giving the TGMD-2 test. Data were analyzed using a two-way variant analysis (ANAVA) technique with a 2x2 factorial design. The results of research and data analysis show that: 1) There is a difference in the ability of basic movement skills between groups of children who are given a direct feedback of indirect feedback with a value of Q 4.19> Qtable 2.95). 2) There is a difference high coordination and a child who has a low coordination Q count 5.91> Qtable 2.95. 3) There is an interaction between feedback with the level of coordination towards the mastery of basic child movement skills which is shown with a value of 0.000 <0.05. 4) There is a difference in the ability of basic child movement skills between groups who have a high coordination with direct feedback with the calculation of the value of Q count 12.03> Q table 3.15. 5) There is a difference in the ability of basic movement skills of children between groups of children who have a low coordination given indirect feedback with children who are given direct feedback with a Q count value of 4.03> Qtable 3.15
Downloads
References
Silverman, S., Tyson, L., & Krampitz, J. (1992). Teacher feedback and achievement in physical education: Interaction with student practice. Teaching and teacher education, 8(4), 333-344.
Lee , A. M, Keh, A.C, & Magill, R.A. (1993). Instructional Effects of Teacher Feedback in Physical Eduction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12 (3) 228-243.
Ulrich, D. A. (2000). Test of gross motor development 2nd edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Clark, J. E., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2002). The mountain of motor development: A metaphor. Motor development: Research and reviews, 2(163-190), 183-202.
Malina, R. M., Bouchard, C., & Bar-Or, O. (2004). Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Human kinetics.
Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC. 2006. Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults. 6th ed. Boston (MA): McGraw-Hill.
Nocaise, V;Congerino, G., Boris , J; Amoroso, A.J. (2006). Student Perseption of Teacher Feedback and physical Competence in Physical Education Classes: Gender Effects. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25 (1), 36-57.
Martini. 2007. Prosedur danPrinsip-Prinsip Statistika. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Piek, J. P., Dawson, L., Smith, L. M. & Gasson, N. The role of early fine and gross motor development on later motor and cognitive ability. Human Movement Science, 2008, 27, 668–681.
Stodden, D. F., Goodway, J. D., Langendorfer, S. J., Roberton, M. A., Rudisill, M. E., Garcia, C., & Garcia, L. E. (2008). A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60(2), 290-306.
Shenouda, L., Gabel, L., & Timmons, B. W. (2011). Preschooler focus-physical activity and motor skill development. Child Health & Exercise Medicine Program, 1, 1-2.
Pope, M. L., Liu, T., & Getchell, N. (2011). Object-control skills in Hispanic preschool children enrolled in head start. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112(1), 193-200.
Child Health & Exercise Medicine Program McMaster University. (2013). Preschooler Physical Activity and Mootor Skill Development.https://fhs.mcmaster.ca/chemp/documents/PreschoolerFocusIssue3-MotorSkills-updatedSECURED.pdf
Bakhtiar, S. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran, Lokasi Sekolah, Dan Kemampuan Gerak Dasar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 20(2).
Tsapakidou, A., Stefanidou, S., & Tsompanaki, E. (2014). Locomotor development of children aged 3.5 to 5 years in nursery schools in Greece. Review of European Studies, 6(2), 1.
Gusril. 2015. Perkembangan Motorik pada Masa Anak-Anak. Padang : UNP Press.
Altinkok, Mustafa. (2016). The Effects of Coordination and Movement Education on PreSchool Children Basic Motor Skills. Improvement Universal Journal of Education Research 4 (5) 1050-1058.
Ružbarská, I. (2016). Physical fitness of primary school children in the reflection of different levels of gross motor coordination. Acta Gymnica, 46(4), 184-192.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet. 2016.
Bakhtiar, S., & Famelia, R. (2017, December). Institute Role of Teachers' Education in Improving the Standard of Development Achievement Rate and Standard of Teacher and Education Personnels of Early Childhood Education. In International Conference of Early Childhood Education (ICECE 2017). Atlantis Press.
Tompsett, C., Sanders, R., Taylor, C., & Cobley, S. (2017). Pedagogical approaches to and effects of fundamental movement skill interventions on health outcomes: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(9), 1795-1819.
Oktarifaldi, O., Syahputra, R., Putri, L. P., & Bakhtiar, S. (2019). The Effect Of Agility, Coordination And Balance On The Locomotor Ability Of Students Aged 7 To 10 Years. Jurnal Menssana, 4(2), 190-200.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
